FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Q1: How does the Philippines government feel about public-private partnerships in general?
The Public-Private Partnership (PPP)
Program is one of the key strategies identified by the Aquino
administration to achieve inclusive growth through infrastructure and
development projects. PPPs bring in the advantages of private sector
initiatives such as the efficient and accelerated provision of public
goods and services. These ensure that public needs are addressed
effectively. Moreover, it encourages the collaboration of both the
public and the private sector in achieving a shared goal of growth and
development.
The Build-Operate
Transfer Law which governs the PPP allows participation of both local
and foreign companies in PPP projects. Regardless of nationality, anyone
is encouraged to invest in the Philippines. With the liberalization of
the foreign investment law, 100% foreign equity may be allowed in all
areas of investment except those reserved for Filipinos by mandate of
the Philippine constitution and existing laws. Nonetheless, foreign
companies are welcome to participate in the competitive bidding of
projects and in providing transaction advisory for projects under the
Project Development and Monitoring Facility.
Q3: Where does the Philippines government think public-private partnerships are headed in the future?
Through collective
efforts of the government and the invaluable support of the private
sector, we are positive that the PPP program will take off and be one of
the main drivers that will fast-track the development of quality
infrastructure projects and delivery of quality government services. As
the PPP program is anchored on good governance, it will not just address
the country’s infrastructure deficiency and accelerate delivery of
services but it also supports PNoy’s anti-corruption and straight path
advocacy. Under the PPP program, the projects will be implemented in a
transparent manner, under a level playing field thru open competitive
bidding and with full accountability.
Q4: Are there reforms which NEDA
will implement in the investments programming process? What are the
reforms that will make the process faster?
The government is committed to
facilitate the approval and implementation process of PPP projects.
Solicited proposals will be processed within six (6) months and
unsolicited proposals will be processed within nine (9) months.
Qualified PPP projects should have the complete documents that are
necessary to facilitate the approval process.
Q5: What specific provisions in the BOT Law IRR and Joint Venture Guidelines will be amended?
The BOT Law, the IRR of the BOT Law, the
JV Guidelines, as well as the Procurement Law shall be revisited to
propose amendments that would ensure competition, efficiency, and speed
in the PPP process.
Specifically for the JV Guidelines,
proposed amendments are currently being formulated. Among the main
proposed amendments are the provisions for ICC/NEDA Board Approval of
the JV project, and timeline for the submission of comparative proposals
in the case of an unsolicited JV proposal
.
Q6: If the PPP Center is under
NEDA, would there not be a conflict of interest since NEDA is the ICC
secretariat in charge of evaluating projects? What is the relationship
between the PPP Center, NEDA and the Investments Coordination Committee?
The PPP Center, while attached to NEDA,
has its own independence. As mandated by Executive Order (EO) No. 8
dated 9 September 2010, the BOT Center was renamed as PPP Center of the
Philippines and was transferred from the Department of Trade and
Industry (DTI) to NEDA as an attached agency, providing
technical/advisory assistance to the implementing agencies, local
government units (LGUs), monitoring of PPP projects, recommend plans,
policies, and implementing guidelines, among others, with DTI however
retaining the promotional and marketing functions of the Center.
The independence of NEDA Staffs, which are in charge of project evaluation, will be rigorously maintained.
With respect to the ICC on the other
hand, all PPP programs and projects will have to go through existing ICC
approval processes, as required by pertinent rules, guidelines, and
legislations.
Q7: Is the government open to
allowing winning bidders to advance the costs of acquiring ROW? What
mechanisms will be put in place for these advances to be paid back?
Yes, the government may include in the
concession agreement provisions for the winning bidder to advance ROW
costs. Under the concession agreement, the manner of repayment of the
advances shall be indicated. The advances can be paid back by ensuring
that the IA/LGUs shall have budget allocation for ROW in the next fiscal
year.
However, while the winning bidder may
advance the costs for ROW acquisition, the ideal scenario is still for
the government to acquire ROW before tendering projects.
ROW acquisition may be financed through
GAA/corporate funds, depending on the sponsoring agency (i.e., whether
NG or GOCC) and/or through ODA. A PhP12.5 billion budget for 2011 was
distributed to DOTC, DPWH, and DA primarily to help address these
concerns.
In general (not only toll road-specific projects), the following sections of the BOT Law and IRR lay out the minimum requirements for bidders:
Sec. 5.4 (Pre-Qualification Requirements):
- Legal Requirements
- Experience or Track Record (Firm Experience, Key Personnel Experience)
- Financial Capability (Equity and Debt)
- Qualification Requirements
- Technical Proposal
- Financial Proposal
- Lowest proposed toll, fee, rental or charge at the start of project preparation, if a pre-agreed parametric tariff adjustment formula is prescribed in the bid document;
- Lowest present value of proposed tolls, fees, rentals and other charges for the period covered by the contract;
- Lowest present value of government subsidy to be provided for the period covered by the contract;
- Highest present value of proposed payments to the Government, such as: concession fees, lease/rental payments, fixed/guaranteed payments, and/or variable payments/percentage shares of revenue for the period covered by the contract; or
- Any other appropriate financial bid parameter as may be approved by the Approving Body.
Regulatory risk arises when there is a statutory regulator involved and there are changes in regulations affecting pricing or other changes imposed on the private proponent, which do not reflect its investment expectations (as reflected in the Financial Model).
For PPP Projects, the concession agreements between the government and the project proponent may indicate a pre-agreed parametric formula or whatever mechanism dealing with changes in prices to maintain predictability of project cashflows during the concession period. The regulatory risk normally arises when government intervenes with price setting that deviates from what is contemplated in the contract. Since this is entirely within the government’s control, it has to take on the difference. Moneys may have to be set aside for this (contingent liability).
Q11: How will the government ensure that projects are viable and bankable even before they are bid?
Given that the government is keen on
supporting priority PPP projects, it will closely review the project’s
financial cashflow to ensure its sustainability and a reasonable rate of
return is flowed back to the project proponent.
The review of a project proposal’s
viability and bankability is foremost, a responsibility of the
implementing agencies (IAs). IAs should ensure realistic feasibility
study-grade and detailed engineering design-grade financial assumptions.
Further, major capital project proposals
of IAs are thoroughly evaluated by the NEDA as Secretariat to the ICC
especially in terms of demand, technical, financial (including risk),
economic and institutional viability.
Prior to FS preparation and bidding, it
is imperative that IAs/LGUs conduct proper business case/pre-FS
including land packaging of PPPs.
To create greater certainty for
undertaking business case or pre-feasibility/feasibility studies, the
government constituted a Project Development and Monitoring Facility
(PDMF), which the PPP Center is managing. The PDMF is a revolving fund
available for the procurement of consulting services, which will conduct
the pre-investment activities for potential PPP Projects.
Q12: How much money is the
government prepared to spend on project development per project? Per
year? Where will this money come from?
The revitalized PPP Center is lodged
with a Project Development and Monitoring Facility, with a working fund
of PhP300 Million to be used for the conduct of project preparatory
studies (e.g., business case, F/S) for selected (possible) PPP programs
and projects. Aside from this, several external donor agencies are
already extending technical assistance in PPP project development
process.
Q13: What will the role of external advisors be in the project development process?
There is no prohibition against outsourcing of project development services to external advisors or consultants. Hiring their services is demand-based or as deemed necessary by the IAs/LGUs. However, one of the usual problems with external advisors is weak transition and transfer of capabilities to the IA/LGU personnel themselves after the term of contract by the consultants.
External advisors shall assist IAs/LGUs in conducting business case or pre-FS of PPPs, FS preparation, contract preparation and detailed engineering. Business case shall include initial study of project’s potential financial and economic viability. External advisors shall further assist until a project is bid out or awarded for implementation.
Q14: Will the government hire external advisors during the bidding process? What will their role be?
It is possible for IAs to hire external advisors during the bidding process as may be deemed necessary.
Given the complexity of PPPs, external advisors need to be hired during the bidding process specifically for preparation of bid docs and re-hired (hiring may not be all throughout the process) upon opening of bids to assist IAs/LGUs evaluate the bid submissions. This is to ensure that the bidding rules are strictly followed by all.
Q15: What criteria will the government use to determine whether to bid projects out on a PPP basis?
These basic principles are considered:
- excludability/non-excludability of project benefits (generally and theoretically, the public sector should provide goods which are non-excludable such as national defense because it is difficult to charge end-users; the private sector may provide excludable goods such as private goods and club goods because it is reasonably priced and possible to prevent other potential consumers (e.g. those who have not paid for the good or service) from actually consuming the good or service;
- competition and price contestability (if prices to end users are cheaper when provided by the private sector (PS), then PS may finance the project); and
- Cost recovery components/bankability of the project – if fees, charges and tolls may be imposed, it is a general indication that private sector may provide the service.
Q16: Based on what criteria will the government prioritize the selection of certain projects over others?
The selection criteria includes
consistency with the sector’s development plan/masterplan, prospects for
bankability/viability, readiness of the project in terms of completion
of studies, and level of government support required for the project.
The projects identified for bidding are
those that the IAs considered as highly implementable. This means that
the project feasibility studies have been recently updated, the IA’s
identified these as their priority projects, there is not much issue on
government funding, and the projects are initially determined as
financially viable for private financing.
Q17: What is the process going to be for projects to be bid out?
Rules 3 to 8 of the BOT Law IRR details
the bidding process from preparation to evaluation of bid documents.
Currently, the government is reviewing the applicable legal instruments
to streamline the approval process.
The BOT Law and its IRR, the JV
Guidelines, as well as the Procurement Law shall be revisited to propose
amendments that would ensure competition, efficiency, and speed in the
PPP process.
For hiring of consultants/external
advisors (for the preparation of pre-FS, FS, bidding docs, etc), the
governing law is the GPRA or Republic Act No. 9184.
Q19: How long will the process take?
Processes that are within the government
control shall be undertaken within six months reckoning from the
project approval upto the notice of award. This presupposes that
complete and qualified documentation shall be submitted to the
appropriate approving body. The great responsibility therefore is lodged
to the IAs.
However, the revitalized PPP Center
shall actively assist the IAs with the endview of facilitating the PPP
process up to project implementation.
Upon approval of a project proposal by
approving body, if an IA/LGU shall hire external consultants for
preparation of bid documents, the timeline for hiring shall range from
34 to 170 calendar days based on GPRA. This timeline excludes the actual
time the hired consultants shall render its service (prepare the bid
docs).
Under the BOT Law/IRR, the processing
ranges from 260 to 290 days (approximate). This covers from approval of
the project proposal up to issuance of notice to commence
implementation. Please take note that this approximation excludes the
34-170 days for hiring of consultants (of GPRA).
Q20: There are still projects
approved several years ago which have yet to start. What is causing
these delays, and what is the government doing about these?
One major factor is failure of the private sector to have financial
closure, which is typically a condition precedent to the effectivity of
the concession agreement. This could be within the control of the
private sector and the government could assist on a best effort basis in
facilitating the financial closure.Other factors include ROW issues and resettlement issues, which could involve judicial intervention.
Q21: The government is committed to approving projects within 6 months. Is this feasible, given the complexity of some of the projects and the time required to prepare decent bids?
Yes, this is possible, if an IA/LGU has already done its due diligence, completed all requirements for project evaluation/approval, and prepared all the bid documents prior to approval of a project. Given these, a project may be awarded to the winning proponent/PS within 6 months.
Q22: Please clarify what the government’s policy will be toward unsolicited proposals. Under what conditions will the government accept unsolicited proposals?
While the government is promoting the
solicited track, unsolicited proposals may still be accepted under a
stringent application of the requirements set in the BOT Law and its
IRR.
Under Sec. 10.1 (Requisites for
Unsolicited Proposals), an IA/LGU may accept unsolicited proposals
provided: (a) the project involves a new concept or technology and/or is
not a part of the List of Priority Projects, (b) no direct Government
Guarantee, subsidy or equity is required, and (c) the project should be
subject to Swiss Challenge.
Investors are not discouraged from
giving the government their ideas. The government is willing to listen
to them, study their proposals, and possibly develop them to determine
how they would fit into government priorities as outlined in the MTPDP
and the MTPIP.
Q24: The MRT-7 was an
unsolicited proposal, and has yet to start implementation. Will the
government proceed with this project, and why?
The MRT7 Concession Agreement has
already been signed by the private proponent and DOTC (as sponsoring
agency), but is yet to become effective pending fulfillment of
conditions precedent to contract effectivity such as financial closure
of the private entity with its lenders.
Q25: The BOT law says that
unsolicited proposals are not supposed to enjoy any government financial
support. Yet the law is vague on what can and cannot be considered
financial support. What is the government’s policy on this?
Under Section 10.4 of the BOT Law IRR,
the general rule is that the Government may grant investment incentives
and government undertakings to unsolicited proposals as enumerated under
Rule 13 of the IRR. Direct government guarantees, direct government
subsidy or government equity are, however, clearly not allowed.
Sale, lease or grant of usufruct shall
not be considered as direct subsidy or equity if made with
consideration. This, however, shall be also revisited.
Q26: Will the government
consider unsolicited proposals which require guaranteed payments from
the government in some form? (example: MRT-7)
Q27: Under the current law, any unsolicited proposal must be put to a Swiss challenge, but this is allowed only for a maximum of 60 days. Do you plan to make this longer? Can it legally be done?
Unless the BOT Law is amended, the period to prepare comparative proposals will have to be up to 60 working days. This too shall be revisited.
Q28: Will JVs be explicitly allowed under the BOT Law IRR?
Currently, the government treats JV as a contractual arrangement separate and distinct from the modes allowed under the BOT Law. If the current JV Guidelines will be the basis, the main distinction between the two is the role of the government. Under JV’s early government divestment is encouraged unlike in BOT where partnership between government and the private proponent lasts until the expiration of the concession period. After the concession period, facility may even be transferred to the government.
The BOT Law, the IRR of the BOT Law, and the JV Guidelines are currently being reviewed to propose amendments.
Q29: Local governments haven’t always been cooperative with the national government in the implementation of infrastructure projects. What will the government do to ensure that local governments don’t hamper the implementation of infrastructure projects?
This requires close coordination at different levels of the government, and ensure that stakeholder participation is considered in the consultation process.
The PPP Center shall assist along these lines and immediately bring the issues to the attention of key policy decision makers.
Q30: Many infrastructure projects involve more than one local government unit. What can the government do to ensure that there is coordination and consensus among different LGUs and the national government?
This requires close coordination at different levels of the government, and ensure that stakeholder participation is considered in the consultation process.
The PPP Center shall assist along these lines and immediately bring the issues to the attention of key policy decision makers.
Q31: Local government support is critical to the acquisition of ROW and resettlement. What will the government do to ensure that the needed local government support is actually given?
A mechanism that will ensure better integration and coordination with the LGUs has to be considered to foster local government support to national projects. The PPP Center shall review LGU-related concerns to come up with a sound policy recommendation that will address these concerns.
source: http://ppp.gov.ph